1 Comment

Very nicely articulated Stephanie.

This is the space I have been working in for a few years now. The betterment of risk based design or possibly failure averse development (arguably siblings living in the same home) has to, by it's very nature, extend beyond design & development teams.

My experience shows business in systems downstream of risk based D&D workloads, when combined with production based risk analysis, organisations, on the whole, negate the need for most costly re-development of SW, HW, and mechanical artefacts. Even confusion as to the intended MVP success or lack of is better understood.

Alas, it is upstream business systems, before design & development, where choices are made, without a rational consideration of risk, that sets the tone and rhythm most design and development teams find themselves singing and dancing to.

Nice article, thank you.

Expand full comment